

Collaborative law is a way to resolve family law matters without going to court. It focuses on cooperation and problem-solving instead of conflict. In Massachusetts, this approach is most often used in divorce cases.
In a collaborative divorce, both spouses agree to work through their divorce outside of court. Each spouse has their own lawyer, and everyone involved commits to reaching an agreement rather than pursuing litigation. The goal is not to win, but to find practical solutions that work for both parties.
Spouses meet in organized sessions to discuss issues such as property division, support, and parenting arrangements. This approach avoids court motions and hearings while encouraging transparency, cooperation, and realistic planning for life after divorce.
For many Massachusetts families, collaborative divorce offers a private and respectful alternative to traditional litigation.


Collaborative divorce adheres to a defined framework, ensuring that conversations remain constructive and on track.
The process begins with a written participation agreement. Both spouses and their attorneys agree not to take the case to court. If the process breaks down and litigation becomes necessary, the collaborative attorneys must withdraw.
This rule keeps everyone invested in reaching a resolution.
Unlike mediation, collaborative divorce ensures that each spouse has legal representation throughout the process. Attorneys advise their clients, help frame solutions, and protect their legal interests while remaining committed to cooperation.
Many collaborative cases include neutral professionals such as:
These professionals do not take sides. Their role is to help both spouses make informed decisions. Many people find it useful to look at a pre-divorce planning checklist. This can help them decide if collaborative divorce is the best choice for them.
Collaborative divorce relies on voluntary and honest disclosure. Instead of formal discovery battles, spouses exchange financial information openly.
This transparency helps streamline the division of assets and liabilities and reduces unnecessary conflict over finances. This saves time, reduces costs, and lowers tension.
In a collaborative divorce, the individuals participating are responsible for determining the final results. A judge does not enforce solutions that might not suit the family’s requirements. Agreements focus on genuine priorities rather than legal standards.
People often ask whether collaborative divorce is the same as divorce mediation. It is not.
In mediation, a neutral mediator helps guide discussions but does not represent either party. The involvement of attorneys may vary.
In collaborative divorce:
Collaborative divorce offers more support than mediation while still avoiding the contentious nature of litigation. It is similar to an uncontested divorce, however, it provides more structure and legal support throughout the process.
Traditional divorce, often referred to as a contested divorce, is court-based and contentious. Deadlines, motions, hearings, and trial preparation can drive the process rather than the family’s needs.
Collaborative divorce differs in keyways:
For couples who want to avoid escalating tension and public court records, collaborative divorce can be a meaningful alternative.
Collaborative divorce offers several benefits that appeal to Massachusetts families.
Court filings are public. Collaborative divorce discussions are private.
The cooperative structure reduces hostility and emotional exhaustion.
Lower conflict often leads to stronger co-parenting relationships after divorce.
While not inexpensive, collaborative divorce often costs less than prolonged litigation because it avoids court battles and repeated filings.
Spouses have more say in how assets are divided, how parenting plans are structured, and how future issues are handled.
Collaborative divorce is not right for every situation.
Potential drawbacks include:
An experienced Massachusetts divorce attorney can help assess whether collaborative divorce is realistic in your circumstances.
Collaborative divorce is often used for:
It works best when both partners want a respectful solution and are ready to cooperate honestly.
The cost of collaborative divorce can vary. The cost depends on the details of the case and how quickly issues are resolved.
Collaborative divorce does have legal fees. However, many couples find it cheaper than traditional divorce. This is because it avoids long court battles and repeated arguments.
Collaborative divorce may be a good fit if:
It may not be the right choice when cooperation is not realistic or safety is a concern. Understanding the common do’s and don’ts of divorce can help you decide if collaborative divorce is a good option.
Collaborative divorce is a good choice for Massachusetts families. It offers control, privacy, and a respectful process. This method does not avoid tough conversations. Instead, it encourages discussions that lead to solutions, not dead ends.
If you are looking into divorce options, understanding collaborative law can help you make better choices.
If you have questions about collaborative divorce or need help with your next steps, you can schedule a free 15-minute call with our team. This call lets you ask questions, learn about your options, and feel confident about moving forward.
Wright Family Law Group serves clients throughout Massachusetts, including Middlesex, Essex, Suffolk, Plymouth, Norfolk, Bristol, Worcester, and Barnstable counties. Our offices are located in Danvers and Tewksbury.
A collaborative divorce is a voluntary process. In this process, spouses work together to solve divorce issues. They do this outside of court with the help of their own lawyers. The focus is on cooperation, transparency, and reaching a negotiated agreement.
Both spouses sign an agreement committing to stay out of court and work through structured meetings with their attorneys. Neutral professionals may assist when needed.
No. Collaborative divorce includes legal representation for both spouses throughout the process. Mediation relies on a neutral third party who does not represent either side.
It offers privacy, reduced conflict, and more control over outcomes. Many families find it less stressful than traditional divorce.
Costs vary based on complexity and professional involvement. Many couples find it more affordable than prolonged court-based divorce.

